is probably a huge risk to ones sanity, at least solo C3 sites you can run while listening to the more entertaining corp comms, lets not forget the potential to gank the gankers Listening to all those neckbeards on incursion comms though. When you're having issues tanking, it's wiser to drop a depot and tank out your mids while moving cap recharge via flux coils to the lows until you fixed the issue at hand.īottom line is that while HS incursions exist and pay 100mil+ per hour with literal zero risk, there's no point in running high risk C1-3 sites unless youre doing it for fun or live there and dont want to go to HS to make isk. It's far from needed/beneficial though compared to another gyro or CFC.
#EVE ONLINE SLEIPNIR C3 MODS#
(nearly, because impacting neuts punch you from 60% to 30% instead of 60% to 50% due to cap-buffer penalty)ĭC II is one of the mods you can swap in for your first runs, when you're not feeling safe yet and want a safety net. It might take a while, but you can run the remaining anom with more gank.Īnything *upholder* does a ton of laser damage (em/therm) and neuts, orbit far out and has almost no tank.Īnything *preserver* has RR, deals nearly exclusively kin/exp via missiledamage that you can mitigate, orbits far out and tanks decently.Īnything *defender* has hell of a tank, balanced and high damage and orbits in optimal range.ĮD: Flux coils are nearly as good as power relais. Else for solo, I'd ALWAYS start by removing the sleeper sentries. The AB is handy to close in on some upholder/preserver BS in the last wave. I was under the impression that you have to get your cap stability to at least 50% or the neut pressure will drain your cap, is this true or false?ĭo some C3's have heavier neut pressure than others? Is the Capacitor Flux Coil II preferred over the Capacitor Relays? What is your cap stability like with this fit? Then land in site, drop depot and MTU since most of the time you don't need that much cap, and in datas/relics and especialy that triple BS wave, you need a bit more tank. I used a this roughly albeit with meta 2 RLMLs. The fit does require that you kill sleepers somewhat quickly in order to tank them, but having 2 ships on the field or an offgrid booster solves all those problems.Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Inferno Fury Light Missile I successfully ran C3 sites solo in this ship:ħ20mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP MĪt the time that I was running them, that booster was about 400mil, and was worth more than the rest of the ship combined.
So my question is, which would be more preferably to running Sleeper Sites and doubling as a combat vessel in a WH (C2/3)? Id run the sites with a friend and or Logi, and so the tank isnt as much of a worry. Utility High (Same as Sleip, command mod?) Utility High (Possibly Neut in case?) ~~~~ (If im running with a friend should i put a Siege/Skirmish module there?) However, I have some fits for a Sleipnir that may disagree. I feel just from my observations that the NH will be better for Sleeper Sites because of HMs range. I will be flying a Nighthawk and/or a Sleipnir. Im training up my HAC and Command Ship Skills as we speak, so I'd like your suggestions.
0 kommentar(er)
